Meet your
AI Data Squad.

A whole data team, end to end. Any database, any platform, deployed in your environment.

Watch it answer one question.

Q-118. “Why did margin drop last quarter?”, answered across four systems Every number traceable to source. Nothing published that does not reconcile. Open full screen ↗

This demo shows the analysis half of the squad. The architecture, pipeline and engineering work described below runs the same way. We will walk you through it live rather than claim a demo that is not built yet.

Why it is different

Four things a data team struggles to do.

One definition of every metric because two dashboards disagreeing is the real problem

Two teams, two definitions of revenue. It writes the metric down once and applies it everywhere.

The second question, immediately because the follow-up is where the value is

The follow-up takes 90 seconds, not another week in the queue.

It says when the data is wrong because a confident wrong number is worse than none

It checks lineage and freshness before answering, not after someone questions the result.

It remembers every model, pipeline and definition it has built

It knows what depends on the model it is changing. The analyst who built it left and took that with them.

Capability

The work of a whole data team.

A dozen specialisms, one standard, lineage attached.

Data architecturesource mapping, target model, grain and keys, designed before anything is loaded
Data engineeringingestion, pipelines, incremental loads, orchestration and backfills
Analytics engineeringmodelling, transformations, and the semantic layer your metrics live in
Data migrationmoving off the legacy warehouse or spreadsheet, with the history and the exceptions listed
Master data & deduplicationone customer record, one product list. Merge rules proposed, exceptions surfaced for a human call
Data qualityfreshness, completeness, uniqueness and referential tests that run on every load
Reconciliationtying reported figures back to the general ledger and the system of record
Dashboardsbuilt on the modelled layer, not on hand-pulled extracts, so two dashboards cannot disagree
Scheduled reportingthe weekly pack and the month-end reports, refreshed, checked and distributed on time
Self-service & definitionsa governed semantic layer so the business can answer its own questions and get the same number
Alerting & monitoringwatches the metrics that matter and tells you when one moves, before someone asks why
Analysis & insightdecomposing what changed and why, not restating what the chart already shows
Forecasting & trendsprojections built on your modelled history, with the assumptions written down and testable
Ad-hoc questionsthe one-off nobody has time for, answered in minutes and kept if it turns out to matter
Performance & costquery tuning and warehouse spend, finding the job that quietly costs more than it returns
Documentation & governancea written definition per metric, lineage end to end, and training for each team that uses it

Where a judgement is yours rather than the agent’s, such as which definition of revenue is correct or which exceptions to include, see what it cannot do.

Want to see this against your own data? Bring a question your team has been arguing about and we will run it live.
Contact
Limits

What it cannot do.

Real limits, and who is needed.

👤
It cannot decide what a metric means. your finance or ops owner

Whether revenue is recognised on booking or on delivery, whether an intercompany transfer counts. These are business definitions with real consequences. It will surface the conflict and force the decision, but it will not make it for you.

👤
It cannot fix data that was never captured. your process owner

If the source system never recorded a field, no amount of modelling recovers it. It will tell you plainly what is missing and what that means for the answer, rather than interpolating and hoping.

👤
It cannot rule on exceptions. someone who knows the history

The records that fail validation, the duplicates, the accounts nobody owns. It finds them and lists them. Deciding what happens to them needs someone who remembers why they look like that.

👤
It cannot grant itself access. your data or IT owner

Warehouse, source systems and BI tooling all need credentials issued by someone with the rights to grant them.

👤
It cannot make people trust the numbers. your leadership

It produces the definitions, the lineage and the training. Getting teams to stop keeping their own spreadsheet is human work, and it is usually what decides whether a data programme succeeds.

Safety

Guardrails and safety features.

Human in the loop on review, every definition decision, and publishing.

It will not take your data anywhere.

The agent is deployed inside your own platform and works there. Nothing is stored or processed outside your control. There is no Clipeum system holding your records, and no copy of your warehouse leaves it.

It will not publish a number it cannot reconcile.

If a figure does not tie back to the system of record, it says so in the answer instead of shipping it to a dashboard and letting someone else find out.

It will not quietly change a definition.

Changing what a metric means changes every report built on it. Those changes are proposed, recorded, and applied only once someone with the authority agrees.

It will not hide a failed test.

When a quality check fails, the run stops and you see the failure. A pipeline that silently drops bad rows is worse than one that breaks loudly.

It will not leave you without a way back.

Models and pipelines are versioned, and any change can be reverted.

Also from Clipeum AI Sales Squad™

An always-on sales team. It works your pipeline around the clock, answers inbound the minute it lands, and books the meeting while nobody is awake.

See the AI Sales Squad →

Bring us the question nobody can answer.

The metric two teams disagree on, the report that never ties out, the pipeline nobody will touch. We will work it live against your real data and show you what the first two weeks would look like.